As digital agents become embedded in core workflows, they are reshaping the nature of work, prompting a fundamental rethinking of governance models and decision-making structures. Sumit Srivastav outlines a path for strategic recalibration that harmonises innovation with risk, and agility with accountability.
Many enterprises are being driven not by traditional automation but by agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems that act autonomously, learn continuously and collaborate dynamically within ethical and organisational boundaries. These aren’t just tools; they’re intelligent partners.
Unlike conventional automation, agentic AI mirrors human capabilities such as decision-making, adaptability and contextual awareness while amplifying them with unmatched speed, precision, scalability and 24x7 availability.
Combining human creativity and empathy with AI’s efficiency can result in a transformative force which can reshape leadership, build trust and drive adaptive change across enterprises.
To harness this potential, organisations must rethink how they lead, build trust and manage change. The following sections offer a practical roadmap for deploying agentic AI through inclusive, adaptive and action-oriented strategies which can lay the foundation for a future-ready enterprise.
Leading an organisation in the age of agentic AI demands a redefined leadership approach, one which cultivates trust and drives transformation by recognising AI agents as autonomous collaborators rather than mere instruments. This evolved leadership model encompasses:
Agentic AI requires the restructuring of traditional leadership models into collaborative approaches where leaders are guiding, enabling and balancing human-AI offerings. This restructuring process comprises:
Designing operational, ethical, and regulatory peripheries is important for shaping AI behaviour and mitigating enterprise risk. By creating visible limits, organisational leaders can ensure that AI agents operate within trusted territories, thereby mitigating the risk of unfiltered autonomy while enjoying adaptability.
Communicating a collaborative narrative which positions AI as a provider of growth is crucial. Leaders need to frame AI deployment as a path to increase human capability, emphasising opportunities for innovation, personalisation and creative problem solving.
Allowing AI to take over recurring or data-based responsibilities can enable teams to focus on high-value activities such as planning, creativity and human review. Leaders can optimise workflows by reassigning anticipated or time-sensitive functions to AI agents. For instance, organisations are using AI to tackle triaging in consumer service or manage transaction approvals in procurement. This allows humans to focus on high-value activities such as strategic analysis or client relationships.
Trust is dynamic in nature. It is shaped and strengthened by ongoing interaction, consistent performance and transparent communication. To inculcate trust in agentic AI, organisations must design systems which embody reliability, adapt feedback and uphold human agency. Some measures which can be taken to build trust in agentic AI are:
Consistent and precise performance is key to building trust. AI agents are gaining users’ confidence by consistently providing immense value in high-speed decision-making environments.
Designing AI agents to act in accordance with organisational and individual parameters enables them to act as supportive partners. AI agents which adapt to user preferences, protect data privacy and eliminate bias can strengthen trust and ethical behaviour.
Explaining decisions, unfolding algorithmic pathways and allowing human oversight can enhance users’ understanding of agent conduct. By removing the ‘black box’ mystique, AI systems can enable collaboration rather than passive use.
Permitting AI to learn from human feedback and balance its behaviour over time is a crucial part of a collaborative and cooperative relationship between humans and AI systems. When employees provide inputs and AI systems tune their responses accordingly, it creates a feedback loop which encourages collaboration.
Embracing agentic AI calls for a fundamental transformation – restructuring organisational frameworks, redefining roles and reinventing core processes. To ensure the successful adoption of this technology, organisations must embed adaptive change cycles supported by transparent communication, iterative design thinking and inclusive stakeholder engagement.
Sharing goals, outlining boundaries and addressing concerns can minimise resistance and build confidence. Leaders should enable discussions around automation while focusing on augmentation over replacement.
Involving users in selecting or testing AI tools nurtures ownership and limits pushback. When cross-functional teams are involved in pilot planning, tool assessment and success criteria definition, it leads to more authentic and accepted outcomes.
As roles evolve, the workforce moves away from routine tasks to comprehensive insights generation, and handling exceptions and unusual situations. This requires continuous upskilling of users, and organisations need to be proactively involved in empowering their workforce to decipher, challenge and align their objectives with AI-generated insights.
By starting with scoped deployment, gathering feedback and adjusting the agent’s operational model, organisations can minimise disruptions while increasing impact. Businesses can refine governance frameworks by aligning use cases with their strategic priorities.
AI agents are more than autonomous task executors. They are change agents who are shaping new ways of working and thinking. Some of the ways in which AI agents can become catalysts for change include:
Though agentic AI may have moved beyond theoretical debate to becoming a technology which is being implemented at a rapid pace, its adoption is at a nascent stage. Gartner’s 2025 Hype Cycle1 places AI agents at the ‘peak of inflated expectations’, signalling that the enthusiasm for agentic AI may outpace practical implementations.
Plan to increase AI-related budgets in the next 12 months due to agentic AI.
Agree or strongly agree that AI agents will reshape the workplace more than the internet did.
Say they are at different stages of adoption of agentic AI.
Source: PwC’s AI Agent Survey
This combination of hype and early-stage experimentation — what some call ‘pilot hell’— underscores the urgency for a structured scaling methodology. By embedding our proposed approach into their transformation roadmap, organisations can navigate the hype cycle’s trough of disillusionment and achieve sustainable, enterprise-wide impact with agentic AI.
Align | Govern | Enable | Nurture | Transform | Scale | |
Description | Tie AI-agent initiatives directly to strategic objectives. | Establish robust, responsible-AI guardrails. | Build technical and data foundations. | Cultivate talent and culture for human–agent collaboration. | Pilot, measure, and continuously refine agent workflows. | Expand proven agents across the enterprise responsibly. |
Key activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrating AI agents into core operations marks the beginning – not the culmination – of transformation. As organisations move beyond enterprise-wide deployment, their AI adoption journey will evolve along three important trajectories:
Multi-agent orchestration will become the norm for tackling complex, end-to-end processes. By 2026, enterprises will deploy ‘agent swarms’ which can self-coordinate specialised tasks like data gathering, decision analysis or execution by mirroring human teams but operating at machine scale and speed.
Personal AI agents in employees’ pockets will drive unprecedented customisation. Mirroring the bring your own device (BYOD) movement, workers will bring trusted, context-aware assistants into the enterprise, demanding seamless integration between personal and corporate environments. This fusion will unlock hyper-personalised customer experiences as agents negotiate, tailor and execute services on behalf of individuals and organisations.
Beyond task automation, agents will establish themselves as ‘trusted advisors’ offering scenario simulations, risk forecasts and strategic recommendations in real time. Concurrently, AI governance will mature into a CEO-level imperative, treating agents like APIs with rigorous auditing and security controls. Firms which master this balance of autonomy and oversight will surpass competitors, converting agent-driven insights directly into boardroom decisions.
In this emerging scenario, scaling AI agents means more than just wider deployment. It means architecting self-optimising ecosystems where agents continuously learn, collaborate and align with evolving business strategies. Organisations which embrace these trends will transform AI agents from being experimental pilots into indispensable co-pilots guiding every facet of corporate value creation.
Agentic AI use cases are gaining traction across industries. While in financial services, agentic AI can act as loan processing agents that automate document verification and eligibility checks, in the retail and consumer sector they can optimise product pricing in real time by monitoring demand, competitor prices, and inventory levels. This section presents detailed use cases of agentic AI across sectors:
Need of the hour?
The Vendor Service Agent transform the vendor lifecycle management by orchestrating a set of intelligent, task-specific AI agents that automate and streamline every step of the process by improving speed, accuracy, and visibility.
The process starts from the Onboarding & Validation Agent that extracts and validates data from vendor documents using Ai enabled document processing. It ensures completeness, compliance, and direct integration into ERP systems, eliminating delays and manual rework.
After onboarding, vendors interact with a Query Agent that responds to questions around payments, POs, or contracts. This agent understands natural language, pulls contextual answers from enterprise systems, and ensures timely, consistent communication reducing dependency on internal teams. .
For invoice handling, the Invoice Reconciliation Agent automates data extraction, matches invoices with POs and GRNs, flags mismatches, and integrates the validated invoices with the financial systems. This reduces errors, accelerates payments, and improves vendor trust.
A Contract Intelligence Agent scans contracts to track renewal dates, SLA terms, and risk clauses, issuing timely alerts and reducing compliance risks.
All agents operate under a unified Orchestration Layer that manages workflows, enforces SLAs, and provides real-time visibility through dashboards. This centralised control ensures traceability, consistency, and continuous improvement.
Together, these agents transform vendor service management into a scalable, intelligent operations, freeing teams from manual tasks, enhancing compliance, and delivering a superior vendor experience.
Up to 70% reduction in manual touchpoints, accelerating vendor onboarding from days to hours
Consistent, SLA-driven responses that boost vendor satisfaction and reduce follow-ups by 60%.
Near-zero invoice errors through Al-driven reconciliation and exception management and full traceability
Vendor service management has been a critical and complicated process with touchpoints across multiple departments – procurement, finance, legal and operations among others. The process includes vendor onboarding, compliance validation, query resolution, contract lifecycle tracking and invoice/payment processing. Most of these steps rely on manual workflows, unstructured data exchanges (emails, documents, spread sheets) and disconnected systems (enterprise resource planning, shared folders, ticketing tools), making the process error-prone and slow.
Due to rising vendor volumes, increasing compliance mandates and cost optimisation pressures, enterprises are looking for ways to reimagine vendor lifecycle operations. The vendor service agent solution can transform unstructured processes into a scalable, intelligent and proactive ecosystem.
By orchestrating multiple specialised AI agents (for onboarding, document parsing, query handling, invoice validation and contract intelligence), this solution automates routine actions, enhances decision-making and delivers real-time insights across the vendor lifecycle.
The vendor service agent can transform vendor lifecycle management by orchestrating a set of intelligent, task-specific AI agents which automate and streamline every step of the process by improving speed, accuracy and visibility.
The process starts with the onboarding and validation agent which extracts and validates data from vendor documents using AI-enabled document processing. It ensures completeness, compliance and direct integration into ERP systems, eliminating delays and manual rework.
After onboarding, the agent interacts with a query agent which responds to questions around payments, POs or contracts. This agent understands natural language, pulls contextual answers from enterprise systems and ensures timely, consistent communication, thereby reducing dependency on internal teams.
For invoice handling, the invoice reconciliation agent automates data extraction, matches invoices with POs and goods receipt notes (GRNs), flags mismatches and integrates the validated invoices with the financial systems. This reduces errors, accelerates payments and improves vendor trust.
A contract intelligence agent scans contracts to track renewal dates, service level agreement (SLA) terms and risk clauses to issue timely alerts and reduce compliance risks.
All agents operate under a unified orchestration layer which manages workflows, enforces SLAs and provides real-time visibility through dashboards. This centralised control ensures traceability, consistency and continuous improvement.
Together, these agents transform vendor service management into scalable, intelligent operations, freeing teams from manual tasks besides enhancing compliance and delivering a superior vendor experience.
The vendor service agent can transform vendor lifecycle management by orchestrating a set of intelligent, task-specific AI agents which automate and streamline every step of the process by improving speed, accuracy and visibility.
The process starts with the onboarding and validation agent which extracts and validates data from vendor documents using AI-enabled document processing. It ensures completeness, compliance and direct integration into ERP systems, eliminating delays and manual rework.
After onboarding, the agent interacts with a query agent which responds to questions around payments, POs or contracts. This agent understands natural language, pulls contextual answers from enterprise systems and ensures timely, consistent communication, thereby reducing dependency on internal teams.
For invoice handling, the invoice reconciliation agent automates data extraction, matches invoices with POs and goods receipt notes (GRNs), flags mismatches and integrates the validated invoices with the financial systems. This reduces errors, accelerates payments and improves vendor trust.
A contract intelligence agent scans contracts to track renewal dates, service level agreement (SLA) terms and risk clauses to issue timely alerts and reduce compliance risks.
All agents operate under a unified orchestration layer which manages workflows, enforces SLAs and provides real-time visibility through dashboards. This centralised control ensures traceability, consistency and continuous improvement.
Together, these agents transform vendor service management into scalable, intelligent operations, freeing teams from manual tasks besides enhancing compliance and delivering a superior vendor experience.
While GenAI tools have traditionally created content, generated predictions and delivered insights based on human prompts, agentic AI introduces a new technological frontier – systems which can think and act independently. This elevated autonomy not only transforms AI agents into proactive collaborators but also brings heightened enterprise risks and governance challenges which legacy frameworks may not fully address.
In the past, governance models focused on ensuring safety, fairness and respect for human rights. Today, as organisations are increasingly adopting agentic AI to drive innovation, boost efficiency and unlock economic value, it is imperative that governance also evolves at a similar pace. New frameworks are needed to enable these intelligent systems to operate safely, ethically in alignment with human intent.
Integrating digital agents into the workplace goes beyond a technical implementation – it mirrors the dynamics of building and managing a team. From identifying opportunities and assessing agent performance to setting them up for success, the process is similar to the various stages of human resource management. It requires thoughtful onboarding, role alignment and continuous support to ensure that these agents contribute meaningfully to the organisational goals.
Onboarding digital agents goes beyond activating the software. It’s about positioning agents with the right teams, granting them secure system accesses and ensuring that they are fully prepared to collaborate with their human colleagues. Standard operations include continuous monitoring, performance reviews, maintenance, compliance checks and system enhancements – similar to the key aspects of managing employee performance. When it comes to retiring agents and archiving their knowledge, the process is the same as followed during the traditional offboarding of employees.
Thus, establishing a digital workforce parallels the process of building a human workforce. The difference, however, arises when it comes to governing the lifecycle of AI agents. This isn’t solely an IT responsibility. Instead, it demands a cross-functional approach involving automation experts, centres of excellence (CoEs), cybersecurity specialists, legal advisors, risk and compliance teams, and domain experts. Together, these stakeholders must define the rules of engagement – how agents are onboarded, evaluated, upgraded and retired – while ensuring that the operations remain safe, ethical and aligned with organisational values. This governance framework transforms a collection of standalone tools into a cohesive, intelligent and future-ready digital team, one which empowers business functions and enhances agility in a constantly evolving business landscape.
The inherent autonomy which defines AI agents also adds to the complexity of their governance. Unlike traditional software systems which followed strict rule-based programming, AI agents are designed using machine learning algorithms to analyse tasks and determine the necessary action based on their reasoning. This level of autonomy allows agents to function in real-time, which introduces a unique set of risks. Some of these risks include:
Reduced or lack of human inclusion in the loop makes it difficult to ensure that AI agents are acting in a fair and ethical manner. In high-value, high-risk areas such level of independence could lead to undesired outcomes. This presents a challenge for leaders to find the right balance between the level of autonomy needed for agents and the need to control them with the right guardrails.
As more and more agentic systems evolve with higher levels of sophistication, the decisions they make may not be easy for humans to interpret. Simpler, rule-based systems with traceable logic have a certain amount of predictability. However, AI-based decisions follow reasoning powered by complex machine learning models and without a human in the loop they can pose challenges such as lack of transparency, accountability, and issues related to bias and fairness. Suppose self-driving vehicles were to make poor judgements resulting in an increase in road safety incidents or a healthcare agent were to provide incorrect diagnoses. The impact could be significant, hence agentic governance frameworks become critical to make the decision-making more transparent, accountable and aligned with organisational and regulatory policies.
Since historical data forms the backbone for AI systems to learn from, it is important for the data to be rid of any biases for the AI system to be free from a skewed view. Sometimes, AI systems may take decisions that prioritise goals such as efficiency, potentially at the expense of human qualities like empathy, which can be problematic in sensitive situations.
Access to various data types, tools and systems also make agents more vulnerable to security risks such as memory manipulation, making them potential targets, resulting in cascading effects in a multi-agent system. These risks increase the chances of system breaches as compared to traditional AI.
Governance practices which apply to traditional AI governance such as data governance, continuous risk evaluations, transparency in workflows, compliance and user awareness are also applicable to agentic AI systems. However, with agentic AI, governance frameworks need to be more advanced given the increased autonomy and sophistication of these systems.
Organisations find it challenging to implement agentic governance frameworks which are balanced and have the right level of human oversight, automation and AI-driven self-regulation. Some key considerations while deploying governance frameworks include developing frameworks with in-built mechanisms for:
Explainability and interpretability for ensuring decisions taken by AI agents are transparent at all times and the reasoning is clear to the developers
Bias and fairness management methods for faster detection and mitigation of unfair outcomes
Anomaly detection and self-correction for enabling AI to autonomously correct errors or alert humans for corrective actions. Peer-to-peer agent monitoring is another way to rectify errors when issues arise
Agentic governance should also incorporate self-learning mechanisms which continuously refine and update governance models based on user sentiment and feedback, incident response and audit reports. This method of monitoring through a continuous feedback loop allows better tracking and evaluation of agents’ performance. Other suggested practices for better agentic governance being explored include:
Organisations can enhance their existing automation governance frameworks to effectively oversee digital agents and intelligent systems. To ensure comprehensive and responsible integration, governance should span seven critical dimensions:
By focusing on these categories, organisations can create a unified governance structure which supports the safe, ethical and scalable deployment of agentic AI.
Source: PwC analysis
Organisations are witnessing a profound shift from human-led, manual processes to AI-powered systems where autonomous agents operate alongside people with enhanced speed and precision. This evolution promises not only cost efficiencies but also the creation of new revenue streams and scalable service delivery models.
However, as AI agents gain greater autonomy in decision-making and execution, they introduce new layers of risk and complexity. For instance, the HR function must evolve to manage a blended workforce of humans and digital agents. This will require rethinking talent strategies, developing new skill sets, and redefining how human potential is sourced, nurtured and measured. As agents take over routine and repetitive tasks, human roles will need to shift toward high-value, strategic contributions.
To navigate this transformation, organisations must strike a balance between innovation, investment and return on value. This includes developing both quantitative and qualitative methods to assess the performance of human-agent teams. Governance frameworks should also be expanded to address emerging organisational and societal risks. Enabling continuous innovation in this new landscape will require leaders to establish a robust and responsible AI framework, one which ensures safety, ethics and long-term sustainability.
Align | Govern | Enable | Nurture | Transform | Scale | Description | Tie Al-agent initiatives directly to strategic objectives | Establish robust, responsible-Al guardrails | Build technical and data foundations | Cultivate talent and a culture of human-agent collaboration | Pilot, measure, and continuously refine agent workflows | Expand proven agents across the enterprise responsibly | Description | Tie Al-agent initiatives directly to strategic objectives | Establish robust, responsible-Al guardrails | Build technical and data foundations | Cultivate talent and a culture of human-agent collaboration | Pilot, measure, and continuously refine agent workflows | Expand proven agents across the enterprise responsibly |
---|